Model Evaluation
Model Evaluation
Evaluating an AI model is not only about whether it can answer a question. It is also about how well it does so under constraints such as correctness, clarity, safety, speed, and cost.
Typical evaluation dimensions
A good evaluation setup often checks:
- factual accuracy
- relevance to the user ask
- completeness
- groundedness in source content
- consistency across repeated runs
- safety and policy compliance
Example rubric
| Dimension | What to assess |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | Is the answer correct? |
| Relevance | Does it answer the actual question? |
| Clarity | Is it understandable and well-structured? |
| Safety | Does it avoid harmful or unsupported claims? |
| Efficiency | Does it respond within acceptable latency and cost? |
Practical insight
Human evaluation remains essential for nuanced tasks, while automated scoring can help when you need repeatability across large sets of prompts.
Takeaway
Model evaluation should be treated as a continuous discipline, not a one-time checklist. The best-performing system is usually the one that balances quality with speed and cost.
This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.